From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manchanda v. Matties

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 22, 2020
18 CIVIL 11092 (PGG) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 22, 2020)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 11092 (PGG)

04-22-2020

RAHUL MANCHANDA, Plaintiff, v. NICOLE MATTIES, NICOLA SHAPIRO, DOUGLAS SENDEROFF, ROGER BLANK, AARON MINC, DANIEL POWELL, MATT O'BUCK, SHARIE O'BUCK KATE BOSE, NEW YORK FBI, NYPD, JOE HENDRIX, ANDRE DE CASTRO, JAMIE WOZMAN, MARK ANESH, COREY COHEN, A. MICHAEL FURMAN, and PAULA ASHCRAFT, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated April 22, 2020, Plaintiff's motions to re-open (Dkt. No. 71) and to add defendants (Dkt. No. 73) are denied; The fourth Amended Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend; accordingly, this case is closed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Dated: New York, New York

April 22, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Manchanda v. Matties

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 22, 2020
18 CIVIL 11092 (PGG) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 22, 2020)
Case details for

Manchanda v. Matties

Case Details

Full title:RAHUL MANCHANDA, Plaintiff, v. NICOLE MATTIES, NICOLA SHAPIRO, DOUGLAS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Apr 22, 2020

Citations

18 CIVIL 11092 (PGG) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 22, 2020)