From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Malott v. International Prop. Partnership

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 6, 1998
246 A.D.2d 303 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

January 6, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.).


The action was properly dismissed in the absence of evidence that defendant landlord had mopped the floor or otherwise created the wet condition that allegedly caused plaintiff tenant to slip and fall, or had actual or constructive notice of such condition ( compare, Crosby v. Ogden Servs. Corp., 236 A.D.2d 220; O'Connor-Miele v. Barhite Holzinger, 234 A.D.2d 106). The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is not applicable to the facts presented ( see, Anderson v. 35 W. 23rd St. Condominium, 240 A.D.2d 446).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Rubin and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Malott v. International Prop. Partnership

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 6, 1998
246 A.D.2d 303 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Malott v. International Prop. Partnership

Case Details

Full title:TANYA MALOTT, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 6, 1998

Citations

246 A.D.2d 303 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
666 N.Y.S.2d 411