From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maloney v. Sacks, Warden

Court of Appeals of Ohio
Mar 14, 1961
112 Ohio App. 440 (Ohio Ct. App. 1961)

Opinion

No. 6656

Decided March 14, 1961.

Habeas corpus — Dismissal — Another habeas corpus action pending in United States District Court.

A habeas corpus action will be dismissed, on motion, where it appears that another habeas corpus action, between the same parties and raising the same issues, is pending in a United States District Court.

IN HABEAS CORPUS: Court of Appeals for Franklin County.

ON MOTION to dismiss.

Mr. Rolland Maloney, in propria persona. Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, and Mr. Aubrey A. Wendt, for respondent.


The sole question before the court arises on a motion to dismiss, filed by counsel for the respondent who alleges that the habeas corpus case pending in this court should be dismissed because of the pendency of another habeas corpus case in the United States District Court between the same parties.

The petitioner admits the pendency of such other case, and that it is in habeas corpus, between the same parties, but alleges that the questions raised are not in all respects identical. It is clear that the legality of petitioner's imprisonment is the issue in both cases.

The motion is well taken, and the case will be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Case dismissed.

DUFFEY, P. J., BRYANT and DUFFY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Maloney v. Sacks, Warden

Court of Appeals of Ohio
Mar 14, 1961
112 Ohio App. 440 (Ohio Ct. App. 1961)
Case details for

Maloney v. Sacks, Warden

Case Details

Full title:MALONEY v. SACKS, WARDEN

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio

Date published: Mar 14, 1961

Citations

112 Ohio App. 440 (Ohio Ct. App. 1961)
176 N.E.2d 326