From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maloney v. Cuomo

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Aug 13, 2010
390 F. App'x 29 (2d Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 07-0581-cv.

August 13, 2010.

On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment be VACATED and the cause be REMANDED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States.

James M. Maloney, appearing pro se, Port Washington, N.Y.

Karen Hutson, Deputy County Attorney (Loma B. Goodman, County Attorney, on the brief), Nassau County District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y., for Defendant-Appellee Kathleen A. Rice.

Present: ROSEMARY S. POOLER and ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.

The Honorable Sonia Sotomayor, originally a member of this panel, was elevated to the Supreme Court on August 8, 2009. The remaining two panel members, who are in agreement, have determined the matter. See 28 U.S.C. § 46(d); Second Circuit Internal Operating Procedure E(b); United States v. Desimone, 140 F.3d 457, 458-59 (2d Cir. 1998).


SUMMARY ORDER

After our decision in Maloney v. Cuomo, 554 F.3d 56 (2d Cir. 2009) (per curiam), plaintiff James M. Maloney petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. The Supreme Court granted the writ of certiorari, vacated the decision of this Court, and remanded the case for further consideration in light of McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010).

We now VACATE the judgment of the district court and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.


Summaries of

Maloney v. Cuomo

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Aug 13, 2010
390 F. App'x 29 (2d Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Maloney v. Cuomo

Case Details

Full title:James M. MALONEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew CUOMO, in his official…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Aug 13, 2010

Citations

390 F. App'x 29 (2d Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Antonyuk v. Hochul

Because of this capacity, and because of both the stated policy of Defendant Hilton and the stated policy of…

Maloney v. Singas

Because Maloney is an attorney, Judge Spatt previously held that Maloney is not entitled to the less rigorous…