explaining that in many cases “the question of legal causation is practically indistinguishable from an analysis of the extent of the tortfeasor's duty to the plaintiff.”
Summary of this case from Munn v. Hotchkiss Sch.William F. Gallagher and Mark A. Balaban, in support of the petition.
Jay T. DonFrancisco, in opposition.
Decided December 8, 2004.
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 85 Conn. App. 627 (AC 24228), is denied.
explaining that in many cases “the question of legal causation is practically indistinguishable from an analysis of the extent of the tortfeasor's duty to the plaintiff.”
Summary of this case from Munn v. Hotchkiss Sch.Full title:JAMES M. MALLOY v. TOWN OF COLCHESTER ET AL
Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date published: Dec 8, 2004
(Internal quotation marks omitted.) Malloy v. Colchester, 85 Conn.App. 627, 633, 858 A.2d 813, cert. denied,…
Wessels v. BialobrzeskiThere are simply too many factors and conditions that would have to be assumed, and the court cannot award…