From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mallory v. Sessions

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 14, 2018
Case No. 17-CV-12021 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 14, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 17-CV-12021

08-14-2018

DONALD EUGENE MALLORY, Plaintiff, v. JEFF SESSIONS, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

This matter comes before the court on Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti's report and recommendation, filed June 11, 2018. Magistrate Judge Patti recommends that the court grant Defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. 14) and deny Plaintiff's motion to dismiss/strike (Doc. 16). Plaintiff filed objections on June 29, 2018.

With respect to reports and recommendations from magistrate judges, this court "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The court "may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate." Id.

Magistrate Judge Patti recommends that the court dismiss Plaintiff's complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and/or because it fails to satisfy the pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8. Plaintiff's allegations are indeed fantastical, as he seeks the return of $17,429,256,000 that is allegedly held in trust by the United States Attorney General and United States Treasurer. Plaintiff's objections are equally unavailing. The court agrees with the magistrate judge's thorough and well-reasoned analysis that Plaintiff's complaint must be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and Rule 8. See, e.g., Apple v. Glenn, 183 F.3d 477, 479 (6th Cir. 1999) (dismissal appropriate when the plaintiff's allegations are "totally implausible, attenuated, unsubstantial, frivolous, devoid of merit, or no longer open to discussion").

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (Doc. 17) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the order of the court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. 14) is GRANTED, Plaintiff's motion to strike/dismiss (Doc. 16) is DENIED, Plaintiff's objections (Doc. 18) are OVERRULED, and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Dated: August 14, 2018

s/George Caram Steeh

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE


Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

August 14, 2018, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also

on Donald Eugene Mallory #142119, Lakeland Correctional

Facility, 141 First Street, Coldwater, MI 49036.


s/Barbara Radke

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Mallory v. Sessions

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 14, 2018
Case No. 17-CV-12021 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 14, 2018)
Case details for

Mallory v. Sessions

Case Details

Full title:DONALD EUGENE MALLORY, Plaintiff, v. JEFF SESSIONS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 14, 2018

Citations

Case No. 17-CV-12021 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 14, 2018)

Citing Cases

Mallory v. Barr

In Mallory v. Sessions, the court "agree[d] with the magistrate judge's thorough and well-reasoned analysis…