From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mallick v. Sakaria

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 21, 1986
119 A.D.2d 733 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

April 21, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hyman, J.).


Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellants' argument, the record amply supports the trial court's determination that they defaulted in making payments on the mortgage note. Furthermore, the trial court did not err in granting the plaintiff mortgagee a reasonable fee for managing the mortgaged property, in view of the appellants' express agreement with regard thereto (see, Gordon v. Krellman, 207 App. Div. 773; 38 N.Y. Jur, Mortgages Deeds of Trust, § 123).

We have examined the appellant's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Gibbons and Bracken, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mallick v. Sakaria

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 21, 1986
119 A.D.2d 733 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Mallick v. Sakaria

Case Details

Full title:BAWA N. MALLICK, Respondent v. RAMESH M. SAKARIA et al., Appellants, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 21, 1986

Citations

119 A.D.2d 733 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)