From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Malka v. Grober

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department
Feb 25, 2022
No. 2022-62187 (N.Y. App. Div. Feb. 25, 2022)

Opinion

2022-62187 Motion 2020-05001

02-25-2022

Haim Malka, etc., respondent, v. Lindsey Grober, etc., appellant, Dinesh Shukla, etc., et al., defendants. Index No. 710729/2016


Unpublished Opinion

MOTION DECISION

BETSY BARROS, J.P. CHERYL E. CHAMBERS JOSEPH J. MALTESE PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 26, 2020. Motion by the appellant to stay the trial in the above-entitled action, pending hearing and determination of the appeal.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is dismissed for failure to provide proof of service in accordance with the terms of the order to show cause.

BARROS, J.P., CHAMBERS, MALTESE and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Malka v. Grober

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department
Feb 25, 2022
No. 2022-62187 (N.Y. App. Div. Feb. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Malka v. Grober

Case Details

Full title:Haim Malka, etc., respondent, v. Lindsey Grober, etc., appellant, Dinesh…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department

Date published: Feb 25, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-62187 (N.Y. App. Div. Feb. 25, 2022)