From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MALIK v. LEAL

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Dec 23, 2010
No. 02-09-00386-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 23, 2010)

Opinion

No. 02-09-00386-CV

Delivered: December 23, 2010.

Appealed from the 48th District Court of Tarrant County.

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On November 19, 2010, we notified appellant Amjad Malik that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response. Because appellant Amjad Malik's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). Appellant Amjad Malik shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

MALIK v. LEAL

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Dec 23, 2010
No. 02-09-00386-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 23, 2010)
Case details for

MALIK v. LEAL

Case Details

Full title:AMJAD MALIK, APPELLANT v. DANIEL LEAL D/B/A LEAL CONSTRUCTION, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Dec 23, 2010

Citations

No. 02-09-00386-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 23, 2010)