From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Dec 27, 2012
CASE NO.: 2:12-cv-267-UA-SPC (M.D. Fla. Dec. 27, 2012)

Summary

adopting reasoning of Malibu Media, LLC v. John Does 1–28, No. 8:12–cv–1667–JDW–MAP, Order (Doc. No. 22)

Summary of this case from Malibu Media, LLC v. John Does 1, 2, 4-7, 11, 16, 17, & 21

Opinion

CASE NO.: 2:12-cv-267-UA-SPC

12-27-2012

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOES 1-67, Defendants.


ORDER

For the reasons stated in Malibu Media, LLC v. John Does 1-28, No. 8:12-cv-1667-JDW-MAP (Doc. 22), each claim against each defendant, except the claim against John Doe 1, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and each defendant, except John Doe 1, is "drop[ped]" under Rule 21, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. John Doe 1 is the only defendant who remains in this action.

The "drop[ped]" John Does' motions (Docs. 13, 15, 16, 17, 18) are DENIED AS MOOT. The report and recommendation (Doc. 35) is ADOPTED IN PART. The below procedure, quoted from the report and recommendation (Doc. 36, app'x. A at 13-14), governs the plaintiff's communication with John Doe 1:

Plaintiff shall immediately inform each John Doe Defendant who contacts Plaintiff or whom Plaintiff contacts that said John Doe Defendant has the right to obtain legal counsel to represent him or her in this matter and that anything said or
provided by the John Doe Defendant can and likely will be used against him or her in this proceeding.
Any John Doe Defendant who does not wish to be contacted by Plaintiff may at any time inform Plaintiff by phone or send Plaintiff's counsel a letter or e-mail addressed to copyright@lebfirm.com that states: "Please do not contact me (again) prior to serving me in this matter."
Plaintiff must notify the John Doe Defendant, or his or her counsel if represented, of Plaintiff's intent to name and serve the John Doe Defendant at least fourteen (14) calendar days prior to seeking issuance of a summons from the Clerk for the identified John Doe Defendant.
Otherwise, the report and recommendation (Doc. 35) is DENIED AS MOOT. The plaintiff's second motion to extend time to serve (Doc. 36) is GRANTED. The plaintiff must serve John Doe 1 on or before FEBRUARY 1, 2013.

ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on December 27, 2012.

________________________

STEVEN D. MERRYDAY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Dec 27, 2012
CASE NO.: 2:12-cv-267-UA-SPC (M.D. Fla. Dec. 27, 2012)

adopting reasoning of Malibu Media, LLC v. John Does 1–28, No. 8:12–cv–1667–JDW–MAP, Order (Doc. No. 22)

Summary of this case from Malibu Media, LLC v. John Does 1, 2, 4-7, 11, 16, 17, & 21
Case details for

Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOES 1-67, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Dec 27, 2012

Citations

CASE NO.: 2:12-cv-267-UA-SPC (M.D. Fla. Dec. 27, 2012)

Citing Cases

Malibu Media, LLC v. John Does 1, 2, 4-7, 11, 16, 17, & 21

Bubble Gum Prods., LLC v. Does 1–80, No. 12–20367–CIV, 2012 WL 2953309, at *3 (S.D.Fla. July 19, 2012); see…