Maki v. United States

2 Citing cases

  1. Yoho v. United States

    202 F.2d 241 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 8 times

    The court was entitled to conclude that appellant was satisfied that this action of the court removed the prejudice, if any, in the prosecution's remarks, for he failed either to move to strike or to instruct the jury to disregard the evidence. Langford v. United States, 9 Cir., 178 F.2d 48, 55; Heskett v. United States, 9 Cir., 58 F.2d 897; Maki v. United States, 9 Cir., 12 F.2d 668. The judgment is affirmed.

  2. Bradshaw v. United States

    15 F.2d 970 (9th Cir. 1926)   Cited 11 times

    No motion was made to strike the objectional remarks at the time they were made, and there was no request for an instruction in relation thereto. There is therefore nothing before us for review. McDonough v. United States (C.C.A.) 299 F. 30; Maki v. United States (C.C.A.) 12 F.2d 668. The judgment of the court below is affirmed.