From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Makas v. Russo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 13, 1997
237 A.D.2d 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

March 13, 1997.

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Ulster County (Bruhn, J.), entered April 29, 1996, which affirmed a judgment of the Town Court of the Town of Hurley in favor of defendant.

Before: Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ.


In June 1994, the parties entered into a lease governing certain premises located in the Town of Hurley, Ulster County. It appears that defendant thereafter failed to pay rent in accordance with the terms of the lease and, in June 1995, plaintiff obtained a warrant for defendant's eviction. Defendant, believing that subsequent events had revived the landlord/tenant relationship, moved to, inter alia, annul the warrant of eviction. At the conclusion of the hearing that followed, Town Court terminated the eviction proceeding and permitted defendant to remain in the premises. By order entered April 29, 1996, County Court affirmed Town Court's judgment, and this appeal by plaintiff followed.

Inasmuch as plaintiffs brief reflects that defendant ultimately was evicted for failing to pay the July 1995 rent and, hence, has long since vacated the premises, plaintiffs appeal, which concerns the propriety of the vacatur of the June 1995 warrant of eviction, is moot. As no exception to the mootness doctrine is present ( see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715), the appeal must be dismissed. Plaintiffs remaining contentions have been examined, and found to be lacking in merit.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Makas v. Russo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 13, 1997
237 A.D.2d 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Makas v. Russo

Case Details

Full title:TIM MAKAS, Appellant, v. LYNN RUSSO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 13, 1997

Citations

237 A.D.2d 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
655 N.Y.S.2d 455

Citing Cases

Tamara Props. Inc. v. 91 Charles St. Rest., Inc.

PER CURIAM: This appeal has been rendered moot since the commercial tenant was evicted from the subject…

343-345 Bedford Ave. Hous. Dev. Fund Corp. v. Bruno

On the court's own motion, it is ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as moot, as appellant has been evicted…