From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Majors v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 15, 1984
451 So. 2d 536 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. AX-430.

June 15, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Escambia County, Joseph Q. Tarbuck, J.

James B. Majors, Jr., pro se.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


In this appeal from an order denying post-conviction relief, we hold that the language in the motion,

The prosecution withheld the name and address of a material witness; "The man with the shotgun" who would have testified favorably for the defense and could have verified the defendant's demeanor as it was that day at the scene of the robbery and alleged conspiracy.

does not substantially comply with the requirements of Rule 3.850(e), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

The other issues raised on appeal are without merit.

AFFIRMED.

SMITH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Majors v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 15, 1984
451 So. 2d 536 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Majors v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES B. MAJORS, JR., APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jun 15, 1984

Citations

451 So. 2d 536 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Jenkins v. State

Likewise, Ground 2 does not substantially comply with the requirements of Rule 3.850(f), as it fails to…

Golden v. State

The remaining two reasons relate to whether appellant's motion complied with the informational requirements…