From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Major v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Oct 9, 2003
No. 14-03-00634-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 9, 2003)

Opinion

No. 14-03-00634-CR

Memorandum Opinion filed October 9, 2003. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b).

On Appeal from the 262nd District Court, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 946,508.

Panel consists of Chief Justice BRISTER and Justices ANDERSON and SEYMORE.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of the offense of aggravated robbery. On May 22, 2003, the court sentenced appellant to confinement for ninety-nine years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal. Appellant's appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and no motion to review the record or pro se response has been filed. We agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Major v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Oct 9, 2003
No. 14-03-00634-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 9, 2003)
Case details for

Major v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES LEE MAJOR, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston

Date published: Oct 9, 2003

Citations

No. 14-03-00634-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 9, 2003)