Opinion
July 10, 2009.
Process — Agent to Receive Service — Franchisor was not agent for service for its franchisees nor were they united in interest for purpose of extending service of process under CPLR 203 (c). Franchises — Franchise Agreement.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Maiorino v. Park Tysen Assoc
Supreme Court of the State of New York. Richmond County
Jul 10, 2009
24 Misc. 3d 1215 (N.Y. Misc. 2009)
Summaries of
Maiorino v. Park Tysen Assoc
Supreme Court of the State of New York. Richmond County
Jul 10, 2009
24 Misc. 3d 1215 (N.Y. Misc. 2009)
Case details for
Maiorino v. Park Tysen Assoc
Case Details
Full title:Maiorino v. Park Tysen Assoc., L.L.C
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. Richmond County
Date published: Jul 10, 2009
Citations
24 Misc. 3d 1215 (N.Y. Misc. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 51464
897 N.Y.S.2d 670
Citing Cases
Bernard-Moses v. Chick-Fil-A, Inc.
In the context of franchisor and franchisee, case law is to the effect that the relation back doctrine does…