From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maicas v. Leony

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 19, 1889
20 N.E. 586 (N.Y. 1889)

Opinion

Argued March 5, 1889

Decided March 19, 1889

Esek Cowen for appellant.

A.J. Dittenhoefer for respondent.



EARL, J., reads for affirmance of order of General Term, which affirmed order of Special Term denying defendant's motion for the appointment of a referee to take and state the accounts, and for affirmance of the other order of General Term and the order of Special Term affirmed by it so far as they vacate and set aside the report of the referee and the interlocutory judgment, and for reversal of the said orders in other respects, so that the case may stand for further trial before the referee.

All concur.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Maicas v. Leony

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 19, 1889
20 N.E. 586 (N.Y. 1889)
Case details for

Maicas v. Leony

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY R. MAICAS, Respondent, v . LEON LEONY, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 19, 1889

Citations

20 N.E. 586 (N.Y. 1889)
20 N.E. 586
22 N.Y. St. Rptr. 149

Citing Cases

Pinsker v. Pinsker

The referee was appointed to hear and determine all the issues in the action, and it was his duty to have…

Smith v. State of New York

But because they did it then we have no right to compel them, and especially the appellant, to do it again…