Mahoney v. City of Oxnard

Full title: EDWARD MAHONEY v. THE CITY OF OXNARD ET AL

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jun 9, 2015

CV 14-06065 BRO (ASx) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2015)

Opinion

EDWARD MAHONEY v. THE CITY OF OXNARD ET AL No. CV 14-06065 BRO (ASx) United States District Court, C.D. California June 9, 2015

          Present: The Honorable BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL, United States District Judge.

          PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO OPPOSE

          The Honorable BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL, United States District Judge.

         Pending before the Court are Defendants' motions for summary judgment. (Dkt. Nos. 32, 35.) When Defendants filed their motions, they set the hearing date for June 29, 2015. (See Dkt. Nos. 32, 35) Under the Court's Local Rule 7-9, a party must oppose a motion at least 21 days prior to the scheduled hearing date. C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-9. Accordingly, Plaintiff's opposition(s) to each of these motions was due no later than June 8, 2015. Yet as of today, Plaintiff has filed no opposition. Pursuant to the Court's Local Rule 7-12, failure to file an opposition " may be deemed consent to the granting . . . of the motion." C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-12.

         Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why Defendants' motions should not be granted. Plaintiff's response to this order to show cause must be filed no later than Friday, June 12, 2015, at 4:00 p.m. An appropriate response to this order will include reasons demonstrating good cause for Plaintiff's failure to file an opposition to Defendants' motions.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.