From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mahone v. Pierce Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Dec 22, 2015
CASE NO. C14-5665 BHS-KLS (W.D. Wash. Dec. 22, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. C14-5665 BHS-KLS

12-22-2015

SYLVESTER JAMES MAHONE, Plaintiff, v. PIERCE COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable Karen L. Strombom, United States Magistrate Judge. Dkt. 77. The Court having considered the R&R and the remaining record, and no objections having been filed, does hereby find and order as follows:

(1) The R&R is ADOPTED.

(2) Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings and/or summary judgment (Dkt. 53) is DENIED as to Plaintiff's excessive force claim against Defendants Rembert, Kasten, Boyle, and Lee; Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings and/or summary judgment (Dkt. 53) is GRANTED as to all remaining claims and defendants.

Dated this 22nd day December, 2015.

/s/_________

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mahone v. Pierce Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Dec 22, 2015
CASE NO. C14-5665 BHS-KLS (W.D. Wash. Dec. 22, 2015)
Case details for

Mahone v. Pierce Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:SYLVESTER JAMES MAHONE, Plaintiff, v. PIERCE COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Dec 22, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. C14-5665 BHS-KLS (W.D. Wash. Dec. 22, 2015)

Citing Cases

Waller v. Mann

To the extent these statements concern the driver's state of mind, they are not based on Kimble and Choi's…

Steiner v. Kempster

Further, allegations supporting a finding that a defendant engaged in a “cover-up of [constitutional]…