Opinion
35941-21W
07-08-2022
ORDER
Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge
On March 7, 2022, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. In the attachments to his motion, respondent improperly failed to refrain from including, or to take appropriate steps to redact all identifying information of the taxpayers to whom petitioner's claims in this case relate. See Rule 345(b), Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.
Upon due consideration and for cause, it is
ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is sealed from public view and shall be retained by the Court in a sealed file which shall not be inspected by any person or entity not a party to this case, except by an Order of the Court.