From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Magwood v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Dec 13, 2011
C/A No. 6:10-2936-MBS (D.S.C. Dec. 13, 2011)

Opinion

C/A No. 6:10-2936-MBS

12-13-2011

Ronald Magwood, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff Ronald Magwood filed the within action on November 12, 2010, seeking judicial review of a final decision of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff's applications for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits.

In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 73.02, D.S.C., this matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Kevin F. McDonald for pretrial handling. On November 21, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation in which he determined that the decision of the Commissioner was supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the decision be affirmed. Plaintiff filed no objection to the Report and Recommendation.

The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility for making a final determination remains with this court. Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of any portions of the Report and Recommendation to which a specific objection is made. The court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation made by the Magistrate Judge or may recommit the matter to the Magistrate Judge with instructions. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must "only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005).

The court has carefully reviewed the record and concurs in the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The court adopts the Report and Recommendation and incorporates it herein by reference. The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Margaret B. Seymour

United States District Judge
Columbia, South Carolina
December 13, 2011


Summaries of

Magwood v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Dec 13, 2011
C/A No. 6:10-2936-MBS (D.S.C. Dec. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Magwood v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Ronald Magwood, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Date published: Dec 13, 2011

Citations

C/A No. 6:10-2936-MBS (D.S.C. Dec. 13, 2011)

Citing Cases

Rinaldi v. Berryhill

With respect to financial constraints in obtaining treatment, the Fourth Circuit has held that an ALJ may…