From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Magoni-Detwiler v. Bloomingdale

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Sep 25, 2008
293 F. App'x 928 (3d Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-3712.

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) September 8, 2008.

Filed: September 25, 2008.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (06-cv-0490406) (Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno).

Before: SCIRICA, McKEE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT


Jennifer Magoni-Detwiler appeals the dismissal of her amended complaint in the suit she brought against numerous defendants after she was denied unemployment compensation. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm.

In his thoughtful and well reasoned Memorandum, Judge Robreno thoroughly explained why this complaint could not survive the defendants' motion to dismiss. Since nothing need be added to the district court's careful analysis, we will affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in that Memorandum.


Summaries of

Magoni-Detwiler v. Bloomingdale

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Sep 25, 2008
293 F. App'x 928 (3d Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Magoni-Detwiler v. Bloomingdale

Case Details

Full title:Jennifer MAGONI-DETWILER, Appellant v. Richard W. BLOOMINGDALE, Chair…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Sep 25, 2008

Citations

293 F. App'x 928 (3d Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Ocasio v. Ollson

"Under the Full Faith and Credit Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1738, federal courts must `give the same preclusive effect…

Loucas v. Cunningham (In re Cunningham)

Preclusion principles, on the other hand, promote the finality of judgments, fostering judicial economy,…