From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Magnuson v. Bourgeois

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Mar 28, 2014
CASE NO. 4:13CV412 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:13CV412

03-28-2014

KENNETH J. MAGNUSON, Plaintiff, v. RYAN BOURGEOIS AND WELLS FARGO BNA MORTGAGE INC. ET AL, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On November 13, 2013, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to the 362nd Judicial District Court of Denton County Texas (Dkt. 5) be DENIED.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the court.

Therefore, Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to the 362nd Judicial District Court of Denton County Texas (Dkt. 5) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

RICHARD A. SCHELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Magnuson v. Bourgeois

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Mar 28, 2014
CASE NO. 4:13CV412 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2014)
Case details for

Magnuson v. Bourgeois

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH J. MAGNUSON, Plaintiff, v. RYAN BOURGEOIS AND WELLS FARGO BNA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 28, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. 4:13CV412 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2014)

Citing Cases

Christina v. Pitt

Thus, Plaintiff's argument regarding general personal jurisdiction is immaterial to whether Defendants…