From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Magana v. Robertson

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 6, 2022
2:21-cv-08420-DMG-MAA (C.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-08420-DMG-MAA

01-06-2022

Franky Magana v. Warden James Robertson


The Honorable MARIA A. AUDERO, United States Magistrate Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings (In Chambers): Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Petitioner is ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than February 7, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.

If Petitioner files the following on or before the above date, the Order to Show Cause will be discharged, and no additional action need be taken.

[ ] Proof of service of the summons and complaint
[ ] Amended complaint
[X] Kelly Stay Status report
[ ] Written response to the Court's attached order (order attached)
[ ] Notice of voluntary dismissal (form attached)

Petitioner is cautioned that failure to respond to this Order may result in dismissal of the Petition without prejudice for failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with a court order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See C.D. Cal. L.R. 41-1.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Magana v. Robertson

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 6, 2022
2:21-cv-08420-DMG-MAA (C.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Magana v. Robertson

Case Details

Full title:Franky Magana v. Warden James Robertson

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 6, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-08420-DMG-MAA (C.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2022)