From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Magana v. Corecivic

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Greenville Division
Oct 25, 2021
3:20CV272-JMV (N.D. Miss. Oct. 25, 2021)

Opinion

3:20CV272-JMV

10-25-2021

ERIK MAGANA, Plaintiff, v. CORECIVIC, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER STRIKING AMENDED COMPLAINT [40]

JANE M. VIRDEN U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Upon further review of the docket of this matter, the Court notes the Amended Complaint [40] is not the document the Court authorized by its Order [38] entered October 22, 2021. Accordingly, the document is STRICKEN. The Clerk is directed to amend the docket text of Docket Entry #40 to include the word “stricken.”

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may reurge his motion to amend the complaint within two [2] business days of this date.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Magana v. Corecivic

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Greenville Division
Oct 25, 2021
3:20CV272-JMV (N.D. Miss. Oct. 25, 2021)
Case details for

Magana v. Corecivic

Case Details

Full title:ERIK MAGANA, Plaintiff, v. CORECIVIC, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Greenville Division

Date published: Oct 25, 2021

Citations

3:20CV272-JMV (N.D. Miss. Oct. 25, 2021)