Madrigal v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Full title: Christina Madrigal, Plaintiff v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 24, 2017

Case No. 15-cv-2314 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 24, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 15-cv-2314

03-24-2017

Christina Madrigal, Plaintiff v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant

Jeffrey J. Helmick United States District Judge

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before me is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. filed on December 28, 2016, in the above-captioned action. (Doc. No. 24). Under the relevant statute:

Within fourteen (14) days after being served a copy of these proposed Findings and Recommendation, any party who wishes to object must file and serve written objections or further appeal is waived.

United States v. Campbell, 261 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2001) (citation omitted); see also 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1). On January 11, 2017, the Commissioner filed a response to the Report and Recommendation indicating it had no objections. (Doc. No. 25).

Following review of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and in the absence of any objections, I adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety as the Order of the Court. The Commissioner's decision of no disability is not supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is reversed and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

So Ordered.

s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick

United States District Judge