From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Madison v. Gramm

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 3, 2021
21-CV-4908 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 3, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-4908 (LTS)

09-03-2021

MALCOLM MADISON, Plaintiff, v. ETTA GRAMM; CYRUS VANCE, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge:

By order dated July 1, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within sixty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis (IFP) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Madison v. Gramm

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 3, 2021
21-CV-4908 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Madison v. Gramm

Case Details

Full title:MALCOLM MADISON, Plaintiff, v. ETTA GRAMM; CYRUS VANCE, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 3, 2021

Citations

21-CV-4908 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 3, 2021)