Opinion
23-6632
11-22-2023
GARY EUGENE MADDOX, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE PAROLE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND AND ITS AGENTS; DAVID R. BLUMBERG, Chairman; DEANGELO PATTERSON, Agent; ROBIN D. HALL, Agent; AGENT MOXLEY; JOHN SMACK, Commissioner; JASON KECKLER, Commissioner, Defendants - Appellees.
Gary Eugene Maddox, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Susan Howe Baron, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: November 16, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Julie R. Rubin, District Judge. (1:22-cv-01769-JRR)
Gary Eugene Maddox, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Susan Howe Baron, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Gary Eugene Maddox, Jr., appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants on Maddox's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Limiting our review of the record to the issues raised in Maddox's informal brief, we find no reversible error. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) ("The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief."). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. Maddox v. The Parole Comm'n of Md. & its Agents, No. 1:22-cv-01769-JRR (D. Md. May 25, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED