From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maddox v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Sep 2, 2020
952 N.W.2d 330 (Iowa Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 19-1916

09-02-2020

David Eugene MADDOX, Applicant-Appellant, v. STATE of Iowa, Respondent-Appellee.

Katherine Kaminsky Murphy of Kate Murphy Law, P.L.C., Glenwood, (until withdrawal) and Anne Rohling of Rohling Law, P.L.L.C., Council Bluffs, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Louis S. Sloven, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee State.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION See Iowa R. App. P. 6.904

The district court granted the State's motion for summary dismissal of the appellant's second application for postconviction relief. AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Maddox v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Sep 2, 2020
952 N.W.2d 330 (Iowa Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Maddox v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID EUGENE MADDOX, Applicant-Appellant, v. STATE OF IOWA…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

Date published: Sep 2, 2020

Citations

952 N.W.2d 330 (Iowa Ct. App. 2020)

Citing Cases

Wycoff v. State

This court has previously held that a delay of 121 days was not prompt. See Maddox v. State, No.…

Vasquez v. State

And in Maddox v. State, we concluded "the 121-day delay in Maddox's filing a second PCR application resulted…