From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maddox v. Rinaldi's Expressway Lanes

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 13, 1984
459 So. 2d 421 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Summary

reversing an order entered five months after the final hearing because the claimant's credibility was critical and it was apparent from the order that the facts were not fresh in the deputy commissioner's mind when the order was entered

Summary of this case from Hogan Sons, Inc. v. Birks

Opinion

No. AX-475.

November 15, 1984. Rehearing Denied December 13, 1984.

Appeal from the Deputy Commissioner.

Howard L. Silverstein, Miami, for appellant.

Robert H. Gregory, Miami, for appellees.


The order in this workers' compensation case is reversed, and the cause is remanded for a de novo hearing under the authority of Rappoport v. American Hospital, 406 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

The claimant testified at a hearing on May 12, 1983; another hearing was held on September 26, 1983. The deputy commissioner's order was entered on February 20, 1984, five months after the final hearing and almost nine months after claimant testified. The entire case was determined based on claimant's credibility. Thus, the deputy had to choose whether to believe claimant's testimony, knowing it was discredited to some extent by the information claimant gave to the hospital staff on admission to the hospital, a difficult decision at best and not one, on the record before us, that could fairly be undertaken many months after the testimony was heard.

The vague, ambiguous, and contradictory order makes it clear that the facts of the case as well as how the claimant presented herself as a witness were not fresh on the deputy's mind when the order was entered. The order is stale and must, in the interest of justice, be vacated and the case remanded for a new hearing.

Rappoport v. American Hospital, 406 So.2d 1244, 1245 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981):
The credibility of a witness is largely dependent upon her demeanor. It would be difficult for anyone to recall live testimony after seven months and in all probability the decision below was based upon the transcript. In our opinion the interests of justice require a new hearing.

BOOTH, SMITH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Maddox v. Rinaldi's Expressway Lanes

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 13, 1984
459 So. 2d 421 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

reversing an order entered five months after the final hearing because the claimant's credibility was critical and it was apparent from the order that the facts were not fresh in the deputy commissioner's mind when the order was entered

Summary of this case from Hogan Sons, Inc. v. Birks
Case details for

Maddox v. Rinaldi's Expressway Lanes

Case Details

Full title:EVELYN MADDOX, APPELLANT, v. RINALDI'S EXPRESSWAY LANES AND CASUALTY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 13, 1984

Citations

459 So. 2d 421 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Palmieri v. Naaco

In our opinion the interests of justice require a new hearing.Rappoport v. American Hosp., 406 So.2d 1244,…

Mitchell, v. Metro Dade

Claimant contends that she should have been allowed to testify in person before the judge of compensation…