From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maddipati v. Bucaro

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Feb 21, 1995
892 S.W.2d 825 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 66238.

February 21, 1995.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY; TONY EBERWEIN, JUDGE.

Joseph E. Cordell, Cordell Cordell, P.C., Clayton, for appellants.

Kathryn B. Davis, Davis Weisman, P.C., St. Louis, for respondents.

Before SMITH, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and WHITE, JJ.


MEMORANDUM DECISION


Defendants appeal from the entry of a summary judgment in plaintiffs' favor in plaintiffs' suit for unlawful detainer. Defendants' only defense is a challenge to the validity of plaintiffs' title. Issues relating to title cannot be interposed as a defense in unlawful detainer cases. Meier v. Thorpe, 822 S.W.2d 556 (Mo.App. 1992) [1]; Sec. 534.210 RSMo. 1994. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Maddipati v. Bucaro

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Feb 21, 1995
892 S.W.2d 825 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Maddipati v. Bucaro

Case Details

Full title:RAMAIAH P. MADDIPATI AND SREEDEVI MADDIPATI, PLAINTIFFS/RESPONDENTS, v…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Feb 21, 1995

Citations

892 S.W.2d 825 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)