From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maddie v. Vosburg

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
Jan 16, 2014
146 So. 3d 207 (La. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 2013 CW 1791.

2014-01-16

Mark MADDIE v. Larry VOSBURG and Susie R. Vosburg.


In Re: Larry Vosburg and Susie R. Vosburg, applying for supervisory writs, 21st Judicial District Court, Parish of Livingston, No. 137,406.
Before PETTIGREW, McDONALD, and McCLENDON, JJ.

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Relators failed to comply with Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 4–3, in that their applications for extension of time to file their applications were not filed within the time fixed for that purpose. The writ application shows that the relators were given until July 18, 2013, to file their writ application. They filed for an extension on July 31, 2013. On August 5, 2013, they were given an additional 30 days to file their writ application. They filed for another extension on September 10, 2013. The relators have made no showing that the delays in seeking extensions were not their fault.

Supplementation of this writ application or an application for rehearing will not be considered. Rule 4–9 and 2–18.7, Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal. McCLENDON, J., concurs.


Summaries of

Maddie v. Vosburg

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
Jan 16, 2014
146 So. 3d 207 (La. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Maddie v. Vosburg

Case Details

Full title:Mark MADDIE v. Larry VOSBURG and Susie R. Vosburg.

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Date published: Jan 16, 2014

Citations

146 So. 3d 207 (La. Ct. App. 2014)

Citing Cases

Tower Credit, Inc. v. Bradley

See Rule 4–3, Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal. Although the court can extend that delay upon a proper…

Beall & Thies, LLC v. Ciox Health, LLC

See Rule 4-3, Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal. Although the trial court can extend that delay upon a proper…