From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Madden v. Hicks

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 16, 2023
1:18-cv-00255-ADA-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2023)

Opinion

1:18-cv-00255-ADA-BAM (PC)

03-16-2023

MICHAEL MADDEN, Successor-in-Interest to Ryan P. Madden, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HICKS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS HICKS AND SILVA TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

BARBARA A. MCAULIFFE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Michael Madden and Kathleen (“Kathy”) Madden, as Successors-in-Interest to Ryan P. Madden (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) are proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Following the District Judge's order adopting the findings and recommendations denying Defendants' motion to dismiss, this action proceeds against Defendant Hicks for excessive force and assault and battery claims, and against Defendants Silva and Hicks for California Bane Act and retaliation claims. (ECF No. 54.)

Accordingly, Defendants Hicks and Silva shall file an answer to Plaintiffs' complaint within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Madden v. Hicks

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 16, 2023
1:18-cv-00255-ADA-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2023)
Case details for

Madden v. Hicks

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL MADDEN, Successor-in-Interest to Ryan P. Madden, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Mar 16, 2023

Citations

1:18-cv-00255-ADA-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2023)