From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MacNeill v. Madore

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Cumberland
Aug 15, 1957
134 A.2d 476 (Me. 1957)

Opinion

Opinion, August 15, 1957.

Brokers. Sales.

A commission on a sale of real estate is earned only where the broker is the effective and producing cause of the sale, unless the broker is otherwise protected by the specific terms of his contract with the seller.

Appeal from the ON EXCEPTIONS.

This is an action for the recovery by a broker of a real estate commission. The case is before the Law Court upon exceptions to the direction of a verdict for the defendant. Exceptions overruled.

Udell Bramson, for plaintiff.

William E. Perlin, for defendant.

SITTING: WILLIAMSON, C.J., WEBBER, BELIVEAU, TAPLEY, SULLIVAN, DUBORD, JJ.


On exceptions to direction of a verdict for defendant. The essential facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff, a real estate broker, was attempting to sell defendant's property. She showed the property to Mr. and Mrs. Worden but failed to induce them to purchase. Later, and quite independently, another agent successfully negotiated a sale by the defendant to Miss Margaret Worden, sister of the plaintiff's prospect. He received his commission. Miss Worden bought the property for herself with her own funds and in good faith. She was not a straw purchaser for her brother and his wife. Plaintiff seeks commission on the sale. She had no contact with the purchaser and did nothing to interest her in the property or induce her to buy it. A commission on a sale is earned only where the broker is the effective and producing cause of the sale, unless the broker is otherwise protected by the specific terms of his contract with the seller. A broker who has no contact with purchaser and no connection with the sale itself obviously is not entitled to commission.

Exceptions overruled.


Summaries of

MacNeill v. Madore

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Cumberland
Aug 15, 1957
134 A.2d 476 (Me. 1957)
Case details for

MacNeill v. Madore

Case Details

Full title:MARY J. MACNEILL vs. PAUL A. MADORE

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Cumberland

Date published: Aug 15, 1957

Citations

134 A.2d 476 (Me. 1957)
134 A.2d 476

Citing Cases

Nisbet v. Linberg

We think not. More can reasonably be required of one who would claim compensation for services performed. In…

Bouchard v. Pennell

It was essential to the plaintiff's recovery that he be able to show that he was the "effective and producing…