From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MacMaster v. Sardina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 24, 1992
182 A.D.2d 1132 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

April 24, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Balio, Boehm and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in summarily denying the motion of defendant Sardina to change the venue of the action from New York County to Erie County pursuant to CPLR 510 (1) on the ground that plaintiff was not a resident of New York County at the time the action was commenced (see, CPLR 503 [a]). In light of the conflicting averments proffered by the respective parties regarding plaintiff's residence, we are unable to determine, on the record before us, whether plaintiff resided in New York County when the action was commenced. Accordingly, we remit the matter to Supreme Court for a hearing to determine the issue of plaintiff's residence (see, Cerniglia v Combes, 157 A.D.2d 499) and whether defendant is entitled to a change of venue.

Finally, we do not address defendant Sardina's contention that he was entitled to a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (3). That issue is raised for the first time on appeal and, therefore, is not properly before us.


Summaries of

MacMaster v. Sardina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 24, 1992
182 A.D.2d 1132 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

MacMaster v. Sardina

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH MacMASTER, Respondent, v. JOSEPH SARDINA, Appellant. (Appeal No. 2.)

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 24, 1992

Citations

182 A.D.2d 1132 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

Xerox Corporation v. Town of Webster

We conclude that Xerox should not be estopped from adducing relevant proof of any discriminatory practices by…

Krehling v. Krehling

Thereafter, plaintiff commenced this action to set aside the agreement on the grounds of unfairness, undue…