From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mackie v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Mar 11, 2008
CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00098-MP-WCS (N.D. Fla. Mar. 11, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00098-MP-WCS.

March 11, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Doc. 17, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner, denying benefits, be reversed and this case remanded with instructions to award benefits. The defendant did not object. The Court agrees that the Administrative Law Judge mischaracterized and improperly discounted the medical records of the treating physician, Dr. Lloyd. Rather than providing a provisional diagnosis of fibromyalgia with a conservative course of treatment, Dr. Lloyd immediately and consistently found fibromyalgia and pursued an aggressive course of treatment involving multiple strong medications. Moreover, Dr. Lloyd found objective medical evidence — in the form of muscle spasms and reaction to "trigger points" — to support the patient's subjective complaints of pain. In short, the treating physician's opinion, built up over 25 visits in less than two years, clearly indicated disabling fibromyalgia. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and incorporated herein.
2. The decision of the Commissioner, denying benefits, is reversed and this matter remanded to the Commissioner with instructions to award benefits.
DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mackie v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Mar 11, 2008
CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00098-MP-WCS (N.D. Fla. Mar. 11, 2008)
Case details for

Mackie v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:GEORGINA MACKIE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J ASTRUE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division

Date published: Mar 11, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00098-MP-WCS (N.D. Fla. Mar. 11, 2008)

Citing Cases

Uzat v. Colvin

The substantial evidence standard does not permit a reviewing court to only consider those parts of the…

Smith v. Colvin

The substantial evidence standard does not permit a reviewing court to consider only those parts of the…