From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mackey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 19, 1997
687 So. 2d 974 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

CASE NO. 96-0841

Opinion filed February 19, 1997

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; M. Daniel Futch, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 95-10823CF10A.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


The sole issue raised on direct appeal from defendant's convictions and sentences for armed burglary, attempted murder in the first degree and battery is defense counsel's alleged ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to object to the admission of collateral crime evidence.

Unlike Gordon v. State, 469 So.2d 795, 797 (Fla. 4th DCA),review denied, 480 So.2d 1296 (Fla. 1985), this was not a case of gross and patent ineffectiveness of counsel virtually conceded by the state. We affirm defendant's conviction because there was no objection to the allegedly impermissible testimony. Our affirmance is without prejudice to defendant's raising the ineffective assistance of counsel claim on collateral review by a rule 3.850 motion. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850.

POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mackey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 19, 1997
687 So. 2d 974 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Mackey v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN LEE MACKEY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 19, 1997

Citations

687 So. 2d 974 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Kirkman v. State

Accordingly, we affirm the defendant's judgment and sentence without prejudice to the defendant raising this…