From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mackey v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 9, 2012
Case No. ED CV 09-1124-GW (SP) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. ED CV 09-1124-GW (SP)

11-09-2012

THOMAS MACKEY, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) the defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in favor of defendants Brickley, Palomino, Dougan, Girard, McCoy, Walker, Alban, and Doe, and these defendants and the claims involving kicking, rough handling, exposure to asphalt, and a cover-up are dismissed; and (2) defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on the claims of excessive force by defendants Wolfe and Padilla for shooting plaintiff is denied.

______________________

HONORABLE GEORGE H. WU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Mackey v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 9, 2012
Case No. ED CV 09-1124-GW (SP) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Mackey v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS MACKEY, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 9, 2012

Citations

Case No. ED CV 09-1124-GW (SP) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2012)

Citing Cases

Roberts v. KVSP Investigation Servs. Unit

To the extent that Plaintiff may be attempting to allege a cover-up of any excessive force used during the…