From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MacKay v. Estate of Harris

United States District Court, D. Maine
Mar 10, 2004
CIV. NO. 03-150-B-W (D. Me. Mar. 10, 2004)

Opinion

CIV. NO. 03-150-B-W

March 10, 2004

SEAN M. FARRIS, FARRIS, HESELTON, LADD BOBROWIECKI, P.A., GARDINER, ME, for SUSAN HARRIS MACKAY, NANCY HARRIS KEENAN

WARREN M. SILVER, THE SILVER LAW FIRM, BANGOR, ME, for ESTATE OF PARKER F HARRIS, LINDA W HARRIS, PARKER HARRIS MD PA PROFIT SHARING PLAN

KAREN D. KEMBLE, THE SILVER LAW FIRM, BANGOR, ME, for ESTATE OF PARKER F HARRIS, LINDA W HARRIS, PARKER HARRIS MD PA PROFIT SHARING PLAN


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE


On February 25, 2004, the United States Magistrate Judge filed her Recommended Decision in this matter. On March 8, 2004, the Plaintiffs filed their Objections to the Recommended Decision and, on the same day, the Defendants filed a Response to the Objections. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

1. Therefore, it is ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is AFFIRMED:
2. The Plaintiffs' Rule 56(f) Motion is DENIED: and
3. The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.


Summaries of

MacKay v. Estate of Harris

United States District Court, D. Maine
Mar 10, 2004
CIV. NO. 03-150-B-W (D. Me. Mar. 10, 2004)
Case details for

MacKay v. Estate of Harris

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN HARRIS MacKAY and NANCY HARRIS KEENAN, Plaintiffs, v. ESTATE OF…

Court:United States District Court, D. Maine

Date published: Mar 10, 2004

Citations

CIV. NO. 03-150-B-W (D. Me. Mar. 10, 2004)