From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mack v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina.
May 20, 2016
789 S.E.2d 571 (S.C. 2016)

Opinion

05-20-2016

Terriel L. Mack, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner filed a motion on April 28, 2016 for resentencing pursuant to Aiken v. Byars , 410 S.C. 534, 765 S.E.2d 572 (S.C. 2014). Now, therefore, pursuant to SC CONST. Art. V, § 4,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Honorable William H. Seals be vested with exclusive jurisdiction over the Petitioner's Motion for Resentencing in the above-captioned matter.

Judge Seals shall at all times be vested with concurrent jurisdiction in all circuits of the state to dispose of matters relating to this case, and shall decide all matters pertaining to the Petitioner's Motion, and shall retain jurisdiction over this matter regardless of where he may be assigned to hold court, and may schedule such hearings as may be necessary at any time without regard as to whether there is a term of court scheduled.

If necessary, to resolve issues related to the appointment of counsel, a hearing shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of this order.

Within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, Judge Seals shall issue a scheduling order setting forth the schedule that shall be followed in this matter, including the date of the hearing on the merits. The scheduling order may be amended as necessary.

s/Costa M. Pleicones

Costa M. Pleicones

Chief Justice


Summaries of

Mack v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina.
May 20, 2016
789 S.E.2d 571 (S.C. 2016)
Case details for

Mack v. State

Case Details

Full title:Terriel L. Mack, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Date published: May 20, 2016

Citations

789 S.E.2d 571 (S.C. 2016)
417 S.C. 33