From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MacIntyre v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 15, 1993
625 So. 2d 118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-2805.

October 15, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Brevard County, Martin Budnick, J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Daniel J. Schafer, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


Scott MacIntyre pled no contest to a charge of aggravated assault in exchange for a promise of three years' probation with no jail time. As conditions of his probation, the trial court prohibited MacIntyre from consuming any alcohol and from entering any bar or liquor lounge without permission from his probation officer. MacIntyre argues on appeal that, because these conditions are not related to the crime involved, they are invalid. We agree.

Nothing in the record indicates the consumption of alcohol had anything to do with this assault. We therefore reverse as to the alcohol related conditions based on the reasoning set forth in our recent opinion in Grate v. State, 623 So.2d 591 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

REVERSED as to the alcohol related conditions of probation.

PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

MacIntyre v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 15, 1993
625 So. 2d 118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

MacIntyre v. State

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT ALLEN MacINTYRE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Oct 15, 1993

Citations

625 So. 2d 118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Leverock v. State

The argument that Leverock cannot raise this issue now because he did not object to a few similar conditions…

Jones v. State

We agree with Appellant that the record fails to show the requisite connection between these conditions and…