MacIel v. Knipp

Full title: DANIEL SETH MACIEL, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM KNIPP, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 5, 2015

2:12-cv-01023 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2015)

Opinion

DANIEL SETH MACIEL, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM KNIPP, Respondent. No. 2:12-cv-01023 MCE AC P United States District Court, E.D. California. February 5, 2015

          ORDER

          ALLISON CLAIRE, District Judge.

         By Order filed on March 21, 2014, the court continued the stay in this matter and ordered petitioner to file a case status update every ninety days. ECF. No. 18. Petitioner's last status update was filed September 22, 2014. ECF. No. 20. His next status update was due December 22, 2014. An update has not been filed. Petitioner will be directed to file a case status update within ten days of this order.

         Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

         1. Petitioner is to file a case status update within ten days of the filing of this order, after which he is to continue filing an update every ninety days.

         2. Petitioner shall inform the court within thirty days of a decision by the state's highest court exhausting his new claims, and shall at that time request a lift of the stay and file an amended petition setting forth all of his claims.

         3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close this case.