From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Macias v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso
Sep 25, 2003
No. 08-03-00352-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 25, 2003)

Opinion

No. 08-03-00352-CR

September 25, 2003 DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appeal from the 168th District Court of El Paso County, Texas, (TC# 20030D02683).

Before Panel No. 3: BARAJAS, C.J., LARSEN, and CHEW, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


David Macias attempts to appeal a conviction for driving while intoxicated, third or more. Finding that Appellant has no right of appeal, we dismiss the appeal. Rule 25.2(a)(2) governs the defendant's right to appeal in a criminal case:

A defendant in a criminal case has the right of appeal under Code of Criminal Procedure article 44.02 and these rules. The trial court shall enter a certification of the defendant's right of appeal in every case in which it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order. In a plea bargain case — that is, a case in which defendant's plea is guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant — a defendant may appeal only:
(A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or
(B) after getting the trial court's permission to appeal.
Tex.R.App.P. 25.2(a)(2). On July 17, 2003, Appellant prepared his pro se notice of appeal, which was filed July 21, 2003. On August 18, 2003, this clerk's office notified Appellant's counsel that the trial court has indicated in the court's certification that Appellant has no right of appeal in this case and requested a response. By letter brief filed August 22, 2003, Appellant's counsel admits that Appellant plead guilty to the offense pursuant to a plea agreement, which the trial judge followed and sentenced Appellant to eight years' imprisonment. Appellant's counsel also admits that on August 4, 2003, the trial judge signed a certification form pursuant to Rule 25.2(a)(2) stating that this was a plea-bargain case and Appellant's appeal was taken without the court's permission. Article 44.02 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure provides:
A defendant in any criminal action has the right of appeal under the rules hereinafter prescribed, provided, however, before the defendant who has been convicted upon either his plea of guilty or plea of nolo contendere before the court and the court, upon the election of the defendant, assesses punishment and the punishment does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant and his attorney may prosecute his appeal, he must have permission of the trial court, except on those matters which have been raised by written motion filed prior to trial. This article in no way affects appeals pursuant to Article 44.17 of this chapter.
Tex. Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 44.02 (Vernon 1979). Because the trial court has denied Appellant permission to appeal, Appellant has no right of appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Rule 25.2(d) requires that the trial court certify whether the defendant has a right of appeal under Rule 25.2(a)(2). See Tex.R.App.P. 25.2(d).


Summaries of

Macias v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso
Sep 25, 2003
No. 08-03-00352-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 25, 2003)
Case details for

Macias v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID MACIAS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso

Date published: Sep 25, 2003

Citations

No. 08-03-00352-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 25, 2003)