From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Machinery, Inc. v. Hale Design/Build, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE
Mar 3, 1998
964 S.W.2d 853 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 71841

OPINION FILED: March 3, 1998 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 29, 1997.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HON. ROBERT LEE CAMPBELL, JUDGE.

William James O'Herin, Florissant, for defendant-appellant.

Gregory P. White, Clayton, Richard Felix Huck, II, Michael Elliot Wilson, St. Louis, for plaintiffs-respondents.

Before Lawrence G. Crahan, C.J., Richard B. Teitelman, J. and Charles B. Blackmar, Sr. J.



ORDER


Subcontractor appeals the judgment granting motion to enforce its settlement with contractor and owner. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Machinery, Inc. v. Hale Design/Build, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE
Mar 3, 1998
964 S.W.2d 853 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Machinery, Inc. v. Hale Design/Build, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MACHINERY, INC., ET. AL., PLAINTIFFS/RESPONDENTS, v. HALE DESIGN/BUILD…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE

Date published: Mar 3, 1998

Citations

964 S.W.2d 853 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)