From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MacCloskey v. Krueger

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Sep 30, 1940
40 Cal.App.2d 810 (Cal. Ct. App. 1940)

Opinion

Docket No. 12848.

September 30, 1940.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Appeal dismissed on motion.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Lawrence Hall and Havelock Fraser for Appellant.

Joseph A. Ball and Robert E. Krause for Respondents.


THE COURT.

[1] The respondents having filed their motion to dismiss the appeal in the above-entitled matter, supported by a certificate of the clerk of the superior court setting forth the facts required by rule VI of this court, and it appearing that all of the grounds stated in the motion are supported by said certificate and by the authorities cited,

It is hereby ordered that this appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed.


Summaries of

MacCloskey v. Krueger

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Sep 30, 1940
40 Cal.App.2d 810 (Cal. Ct. App. 1940)
Case details for

MacCloskey v. Krueger

Case Details

Full title:JOHN A. MacCLOSKEY, Appellant, v. RAY KRUEGER et al., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: Sep 30, 1940

Citations

40 Cal.App.2d 810 (Cal. Ct. App. 1940)
105 P.2d 992