From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Macbrair v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 22, 2017
2:16-cv-01048-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Feb. 22, 2017)

Opinion

2:16-cv-01048-JAD-NJK

02-22-2017

Carissa M. Macbrair, Plaintiff v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Defendant


Order Adopting Report and Recommendation, Denying Motion to Remand, Granting Crossmotion to Affirm, and Closing Case [ECF Nos. 17, 18, 20]

On February 2, 2017, the magistrate judge recommended that I deny plaintiff's motion to remand and grant the commissioner's crossmotion to affirm. "[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation unless objections are filed." Objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation were due by February 16, 2017, and Macbrair has not filed an objection or requested an extension to do so.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [ECF No. 20] is ADOPTED, plaintiff's motion to remand [ECF No. 17] is DENIED, and the commissioner's crossmotion to affirm [ECF No. 18] is GRANTED.

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.

Dated this 22nd day of February, 2017.

/s/_________

Jennifer A. Dorsey

United States District Judge

Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).


Summaries of

Macbrair v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 22, 2017
2:16-cv-01048-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Feb. 22, 2017)
Case details for

Macbrair v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:Carissa M. Macbrair, Plaintiff v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 22, 2017

Citations

2:16-cv-01048-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Feb. 22, 2017)