From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MACAULAY v. CULP McCAULEY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1912
151 App. Div. 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)

Opinion

June, 1912.


We think that the authorities cited by the learned Special Term did not require it to deny the motion of the plaintiff for amendment, but that the application was within the purview of section 723 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The order is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the application remitted to the Special Term. Jenks, P.J., Hirschberg, Burr, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

MACAULAY v. CULP McCAULEY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1912
151 App. Div. 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)
Case details for

MACAULAY v. CULP McCAULEY

Case Details

Full title:Charles R. Macaulay, Appellant, v. Culp McCauley and Others, Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1912

Citations

151 App. Div. 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)