From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Macancela v. Kukaj

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 30, 2021
18 Civ. 7507 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 30, 2021)

Opinion

18 Civ. 7507 (JGK)

08-30-2021

BRYAN MACANCELA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BESIM KUKAJ D/B/A BKUK GROUP and BKUK NYC RESTAURANT GROUP, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Parker dated August 10, 2021. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for any objections has passed. In any event, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation is well reasoned and should be adopted. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

The plaintiffs are directed to submit a proposed judgment within five days. The defendants may submit any response three days thereafter.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Macancela v. Kukaj

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 30, 2021
18 Civ. 7507 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Macancela v. Kukaj

Case Details

Full title:BRYAN MACANCELA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BESIM KUKAJ D/B/A BKUK GROUP and…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 30, 2021

Citations

18 Civ. 7507 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 30, 2021)

Citing Cases

Lucero v. Shaker Contractors, Corp.

“An employer's paychecks bouncing may establish liability for FLSA and NYLL minimum wage violations if the…