From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MAAG v. KONTEH

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jul 24, 2007
CASE NO: 3:06-cv-02629 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 24, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO: 3:06-cv-02629.

July 24, 2007


ORDER


On July 20, 2007, Petitioner, Thomas Maag ("Maag"), filed a motion to expand the record. (Doc. No. 10.) Maag asserts that Respondent failed to submit or fully submit two documents as part of the record: (1) "the full and complete indictment contained within Respondent's Exhibit Three" and (2) "the complete letter written by Mr. Shetzer." ( Id. at 5.) Petitioner's motion (Doc. No. 10) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

Maag asserts that the copy of the indictment, attached to the Return of Writ as Exhibit 3 (Doc. No. 7, Ex. 3), is missing Count 3 entirely and provides Count 4 only in part. The Court has examined Exhibit 3 and the four-page document appears to be a fully intact copy of the indictment. Counts 3 and 4 are set forth clearly on the second and third pages. (Doc. No. 7, Ex. 3 at 2-3.) Therefore, to the extent that Maag seeks an order requiring Respondent to file "the full and complete indictment," the motion is denied.

To the extent that Maag seeks an order requiring Respondent to file the letter written by Mr. Shetzer, the motion is granted. As the letter does not appear to have been filed, Respondent is ordered to immediately file the letter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

MAAG v. KONTEH

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jul 24, 2007
CASE NO: 3:06-cv-02629 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 24, 2007)
Case details for

MAAG v. KONTEH

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS J. MAAG Petitioner, v. KHELLEH KONTEH, Warden, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jul 24, 2007

Citations

CASE NO: 3:06-cv-02629 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 24, 2007)