From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

M. Goble Co. v. Mills

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jan 7, 1913
129 P. 706 (Okla. 1913)

Opinion

No. 2465

Opinion Filed January 7, 1913.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal — Failure to File Briefs. A cause having been duly assigned for hearing, and being reached on the calendar in due course, no briefs having been filed as required by rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi), the same will be dismissed.

(Syllabus by Sharp, C.)

Error from District Court, Muskogee County; Charles Bagg, Judge.

Action by Belle Mills, by her next friend, Eliza Mills, against M. Goble Co., a partnership composed of Charles Goble and Merritt Goble. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $3,000, defendant brings error. Dismissed.

Davis White, for plaintiff in error.

Robertson Kean and W. W. Momyer, for defendant in error.


The petition in error, with case-made attached, was filed in this court on March 27, 1911. The case was duly assigned for hearing at the December, 1912, term, and, being reached in due course on the calendar, it appears that no briefs have been filed as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi). It follows that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

M. Goble Co. v. Mills

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jan 7, 1913
129 P. 706 (Okla. 1913)
Case details for

M. Goble Co. v. Mills

Case Details

Full title:M. GOBLE CO. v. MILLS

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 7, 1913

Citations

129 P. 706 (Okla. 1913)
129 P. 706