From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

M. E. v. Lowe's Home Ctrs.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 1, 2023
2:22-cv-00654-KJM-DMC (E.D. Cal. May. 1, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00654-KJM-DMC

05-01-2023

M.E., a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Elijah Elizalde, Plaintiff, v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC, Defendants.


ORDER

Under the scheduling order issued in this case, “[a]ny amendment to the pleadings, by way of stipulation or motion, [was] due by September 14, 2022.” Order (Aug. 23, 2022) at 1, ECF No. 16. A pretrial scheduling order may be amended only after a showing of good cause and with the court's consent. Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b)(4). The “Doe Amendment” at ECF No. 21 was not accompanied by a request to modify the scheduling order or by an explanation of good cause for a modification. It is therefore stricken as untimely. This order does not preclude a renewed motion seeking to modify the scheduling order to permit the proposed amendment to the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

M. E. v. Lowe's Home Ctrs.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 1, 2023
2:22-cv-00654-KJM-DMC (E.D. Cal. May. 1, 2023)
Case details for

M. E. v. Lowe's Home Ctrs.

Case Details

Full title:M.E., a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Elijah Elizalde…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 1, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-00654-KJM-DMC (E.D. Cal. May. 1, 2023)